A Comparative Analysis of the Semi-Persistent and Dynamic Scheduling Schemes in NR-V2X Mode 2
L. Lusvarghi, A. Molina-Galán, B. Coll-Perales, J. Gozalvez, M.L. Merani
Vehicular Communications  (August 2023)
Ed. Elsevier  ISSN:2214-2096  DOI:10.1016/j.vehcom.2023.100628  BIBTEX:@article{LUSVARGHI2023100628, title = {A comparative analysis of the semi-persistent and dynamic scheduling schemes in NR-V2X mode 2}, journal = {Vehicular Communications}, volume = {42}, pages = {100628}, year = {2023}, issn = {2214-2096}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vehcom.2023.100628}, url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221420962300058X}, author = {Luca Lusvarghi and Alejandro Molina-Galan and Baldomero Coll-Perales and Javier Gozalvez and Maria Luisa Merani}, keywords = {5G NR-V2X, Comparative analysis, Dynamic scheduling, Latency requirements, NR-V2X mode 2, Semi-persistent scheduling}, abstract = {Over the last years, the evolution of Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) services from basic safety-related to enhanced V2X (eV2X) applications prompted the development of the 5G New Radio (NR)-V2X technology. Standardized by the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) in Release 16, NR-V2X features a distributed resource allocation mode, known as Mode 2, that allows vehicles to autonomously select their transmission resources employing a Semi-Persistent Scheduling (SPS) or a Dynamic Scheduling (DS) scheme. The SPS approach relies on the periodic reservation of resources, whereas the DS scheme is a reservation-less solution that forces the selection of new transmission resources for every generated message. 3GPP standards do not indicate under which conditions each scheduling scheme should be used. In this context, this study analyzes and compares the performance of SPS and DS under different traffic types and Packet Delay Budget (PDB) requirements. Simulation results demonstrate that the SPS scheme represents the best solution for serving fixed size periodic traffic, whereas DS is more adequate for aperiodic traffic (of fixed or variable size). The study shows that the superiority of DS over SPS becomes more evident when tighter PDB requirements are considered, and that the performance of the DS scheme is independent of the PDB. It is also demonstrated that an adaptive scheduling strategy, which allows vehicles to select the scheduling scheme that best suits the type of generated traffic, is the best solution in mixed traffic scenarios where fixed size periodic traffic and variable size aperiodic traffic sources coexist.} }  - Volume 42, 100628

Resumen:

Over the last years, the evolution of Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) services from basic safety-related to enhanced V2X (eV2X) applications prompted the development of the 5G New Radio (NR)-V2X technology. Standardized by the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) in Release 16, NR-V2X features a distributed resource allocation mode, known as Mode 2, that allows vehicles to autonomously select their transmission resources employing a Semi-Persistent Scheduling (SPS) or a Dynamic Scheduling (DS) scheme. The SPS approach relies on the periodic reservation of resources, whereas the DS scheme is a reservation-less solution that forces the selection of new transmission resources for every generated message. 3GPP standards do not indicate under which conditions each scheduling scheme should be used. In this context, this study analyzes and compares the performance of SPS and DS under different traffic types and Packet Delay Budget (PDB) requirements. Simulation results demonstrate that the SPS scheme represents the best solution for serving fixed size periodic traffic, whereas DS is more adequate for aperiodic traffic (of fixed or variable size). The study shows that the superiority of DS over SPS becomes more evident when tighter PDB requirements are considered, and that the performance of the DS scheme is independent of the PDB. It is also demonstrated that an adaptive scheduling strategy, which allows vehicles to select the scheduling scheme that best suits the type of generated traffic, is the best solution in mixed traffic scenarios where fixed size periodic traffic and variable size aperiodic traffic sources coexist.